Re: [PATCH] compat: Add another rudimentary poll() emulation
flat view
From: Marko Kreen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:52
On 5/27/10, Erik Faye-Lund [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Erik Faye-Lund
[off-list ref] wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
>> Implement the subset of poll() semantics needed by git in terms of
>> select(), for use by the Interix port. Inspired by commit 6ed807f
>> (Windows: A rudimentary poll() emulation, 2007-12-01).
>>
>
> A possible problem with this approach is that the maximum number of
> file descriptors poll can handle limited by RLIMIT_NOFILE, whereas the
> maximum number of file descriptors select can handle is limited by
> FD_SETSIZE.
>
> I don't think this is a big problem in reality, though - both values
> seem to be pretty high in most implementations. And IIRC git-daemon is
> the only one who needs more than 2, and it doesn't even check
> RLIMIT_NOFILE.
>
To be clear: I think this strategy is the best option (at least for
non-Windows, where select() might be our only option).
But perhaps you should include a check along the lines of this:
if (nfds > FD_SETSIZE)
return errno = EINVAL, error("poll: nfds must be below %d", FD_SETSIZE);
Just so we can know when the code fails :)Well, per your own FD_SET example, the FD_SETSIZE on windows means different thing than FD_SETSIZE on old-style bitmap-based select() implementation. On Unix, it's max fd number + 1, on windows it's max count. Thus on windows the nfds can safely be larger than FD_SETSIZE, assuming the actual count is smaller. RLIMIT_NOFILE - I don't see why it is relevant here, as you get error on open() when you cross the limit. So how can you pass more than that meny fds to select()/poll()? -- marko