Re: imap.preformattedHTML and imap.sslverify

Jeremy White [off-list ref] writes:

I did confirm that your patch does work.

However, I assumed that my original patch was rejected.  
I never realized that it had been applied.

That clearly means that no one has ever used this option.

Thanks.  I didn't mean to witch-hunt (did I ever say "the originally
submitted patches were untested"?), and I apologise if you took it that
way.  You were Cc'ed because as the origin of the patch you were likely
to be using that feature.

I just wanted to make sure that the problem I thought I saw was real, and
wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking subtleties in the current
code people who are using the feature are relying upon.

Will apply to maint and merge upwards.