Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/5] MSVC: Windows-native implementation for subset of Pthreads API

From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:59

On Freitag, 8. Januar 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Dmitry Potapov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
AFAIK, Win32 API assumes that reading LONG is always atomic, so
the critical section is not really necesary here, but you need
to declare 'waiters' as 'volatile':
"Simple reads and writes to properly-aligned 32-bit variables are
atomic operations."
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684122(VS.85).aspx

In other words: Yes, you are right.
Quite frankly, I do not want to stretch this statement to apply to the MinGW 
compiler. The code in question is not performance critical anyway. I'd prefer 
to leave it as is - it's undergone 2 months of testing already. Besides, 
IMHO, it is much more readable the way it is written.

-- Hannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help