Re: [msysGit] [PATCH/RFC 06/11] run-command: add kill_async() and is_async_alive()
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:49
On Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
"relatively small chance of stuff blowing up"? The docs of TerminateThread: "... the kernel32 state for the thread's process could be inconsistent." That's scary if we are talking about a process that should run for days or weeks without interruption.I think there's a misunderstanding here. I thought your suggestion was to simply call die(), which would take down the main process. After reading this explanation, I think you're talking about giving an error and rejecting the connection instead. Which makes more sense than to risk crashing the main-process, indeed.
Just rejecting a connection is certainly the simplest do to keep the daemon process alive. But the server can be DoS-ed from a single source IP. Currently git-daemon can only be DDoS-ed because there is a maximum number of connections, which are not closed if all of them originate from different IPs.
quoted
Case 2 could be achieved by using setsockopt() with SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO and a tiny timeout. But notice that we would set a timeout in one thread while another thread is waiting in ReadFile() or WriteFile(). Would that work?I think it should work fine, but I won't give you a guarantee ;) Perhaps we should have a configurable global max timeout, and just set that on all sockets? Or does this open for DDOS attacks?
I'm sure that there is a global timeout already, but it is in the order of minutes, which is too long. Here I mean it to be set to zero or one milli-second so that the connection closes right away - as if the process on the server side had been killed. Hm - perhaps it is possible to really *close* the socket while some other thread waits in ReadFile() or WriteFile()? -- Hannes