On Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Would it make sense to
have a function finish_async_nowait() instead of is_async_alive() that
(1) stresses the start/finish symmetry and (2) can return more than just
Boolean?
...
I'm not entirely sure how to make the interface, though. Any good
suggestions?
I suggest to model finish_async_nowait() after waitpid() so that
while ((pid = waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG)) > 0) ...
becomes
while ((pid = finish_async_nowait(&some_async, &status)) > 0) ...
but where the resulting status is already "decoded", i.e. zero is success and
non-zero is failure (including death through signal); WIFEXITED and
WEXITSTATUS should not be applicable to status anymore.
-- Hannes