Re: [PATCH] tests: handle NO_PYTHON setting

Heya,

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:52, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

This feels a little funny for NO_PYTHON to mean "no remote helpers at
all". But that is the way the Makefile is set up, since we seem to have
only python helpers.

I don't understand what you mean? Do you mean NO_PYTHON implies "no
remote helpers at all", or "not having any remote helpers" implies
NO_PYTHON? Either way, I'm not sure how to set it up differently, not
having that much Makefile foo myself, so maybe Johan and Daniel could
comment?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier