Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:20
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:36, Jeff King[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote:quoted
+const char *show_date_relative(unsigned long time, int tz, const struct timeval *now) +{ + static char timebuf[100 /* TODO: can be optimized */];This was 200 in the original version. I doubt that it makes a difference, but I think in a refactoring patch I think it is best to simply reorganize and make no other changes.
Yes, I just noticed that 200 was much too much, made the note to fix it sometime and forgot the note in the final submission.
quoted
+static unsigned long approximation(const char *date, const struct timeval *tv)I know it's static, but this is a terribly undescriptive function name. Approximation of what? Can we call it approxidate_internal or something?
Been there, tried that. Didn't like it, because it didn't feel enough approxidate (the original) anymore. Not even internally, because of missing parse_date. My other attempts were guessdate and approxidate_bottom_half (but only very shortly). The "approximation", if you consider the functions arguments, seems to me the closest to what the function _is_. OTOH, maybe I should have used a verb...