Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] diff: generate prettier filenames when using GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:52
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:11:17PM -0700, David Aguilar wrote:
+int git_mkstemps(char *path, size_t n, const char *template, int suffix_len);
FWIW, I find this name not very descriptive. From the name, I would expect it to do the exact same thing as mkstemps, but be our own personal implementation. But it is actually a wrapper that behaves somewhat differently. So I wonder if "mkstemps_tmpdir" or something would be a better name.
+ if (pretty_filename) {
+ /* Generate "XXXXXX_filename" */Is there a reason _not_ to always just use the pretty filename? It looks like you turn it on for external diff, but off for textconv. I don't think there is a reason not to use it for textconv. Is there some other code path that changes it that I'm missing?
+ int pretty_filename = 1; + temp_one = prepare_temp_file(name, one, pretty_filename); + temp_two = prepare_temp_file(othername, two, pretty_filename);
I think this reads much better as just: temp_one = prepare_temp_file(name, one, 1); temp_two = prepare_temp_file(othername, two, 1); Then it eliminates one bit of state for the reader to keep track of; I don't have to wonder if pretty_filename might ever change. If I care about what the '1' means, I can go look at the definition of prepare_temp_file (or if you really want to make it more self-documenting, make it a "flags" field and set the USE_PRETTY_FILENAME flag). However, I suspect that all callers should use pretty filenames, and then this bit would just go away.
+ int pretty_filename = 0; - temp = prepare_temp_file(spec->path, spec); + temp = prepare_temp_file(spec->path, spec, pretty_filename);
Ditto here. -Peff