Re: [PATCH RFC3 05/13] send-email: Cleanup the usage text and docs a bit
From: Michael Witten <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:36
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 15:51, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Michael Witten [off-list ref] writes:quoted
All usage text lines should be < 80 characters. A port number in --smtp-server is no longer handled, so the suggestion has been removed.That makes it sound like there is a regression. require Net::SMTP; $smtp ||= Net::SMTP->new((defined $smtp_server_port) ? "$smtp_server:$smtp_server_port" : $smtp_server); and because Net::SMTP is a subclass of IO::Socket::INET, I'd assume that this use will accept smtp_server=there:submission when $smtp_server_port is undef.
I may have been concerned that the SSL connection code doesn't support a host:port specification, so I thought it would be easier not to advertise it:
if ($smtp_encryption eq 'ssl') {
$smtp_server_port ||= 465; # ssmtp
require Net::SMTP::SSL;
$smtp ||= Net::SMTP::SSL->new($smtp_server, Port => $smtp_server_port);
}quoted
---in-reply-to=<identifier>:: +--in-reply-to=<message-id>::Changes along this line in your patch looked sensible, except for the "identity" one which is a bit iffy.
The change to <id> ? Well, I did so, because the usage text uses <id> for compactness; I think everything else matches.