Hi,
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, david@lang.hm wrote:
I am not interested in forking git. but I am saying that a backwards
incompatible change had better _really_ be worth it, and not just be
worth it for the people who live an breath git, but for the users as
well (this is a test that the dashed name elimination failed. in spite
of a volcal few saying that all the commands in the path were causing
problems, most people couldn't understand why the git people wanted to
remove them)
Nope. It was not just because we could. It was an explicit request by
more than one person that we do not put 110+ commands into /usr/bin/.
As for your argument that it should be worth for the users: if you are
really thinking about the users, and not just yourself, you will see that
the receive.denyCurrentBranch change is required.
BTW there is a timeline. Junio said already that it will be in 1.7 and
not earlier.
Ciao,
Dscho