Hi,
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Besides, I have to wonder where request->lock->token is set, and if
that would not be the better place to fix the issue?
Are you suggesting perhaps that we revert commit 753bc91? Or perhaps
create another way to access lock tokens, say, get_lock_token(int
prepend_scheme)?
I do not suggest anything like that.
But I _refuse_ to go and investigate a thing that you should know already,
and that you should be able to defend, indeed, something you should have
defended in the commit message:
Why does request->lock->token have the prefix at all?
Ciao,
Dscho