Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] parse-opt: migrate fmt-merge-msg.

From: Shawn O. Pearce <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:25

Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:10:14PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Also fix an inefficient printf("%s", ...) where we can use write_in_full.
I'd appreciate an updated series if you can send it.  am -3 isn't
"easily" applying it.
Okay, I will then, but FWIW it means that when you'll try to merge this
in next it'll conflict at that time, so I'm not sure there's a huge win
for you at that point.
It may actually be a good idea to rebase this against master.

Reading Junio's notes for sg/merge-options (the branch this conflict
is coming out of) it sounds like we'd want to revert that anyway.
Its been around since April and Junio was talking about it needing
to be in a 1.7.0 release.  Its not going to graduate anytime soon.

IOW I'm quite tempted to revert sg/merge-options and cancel the
branch out of next.

-- 
Shawn.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help