Thread (19 messages) flat view 19 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] parse-opt: migrate fmt-merge-msg.

From: Pierre Habouzit <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:25

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:10:14PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Also fix an inefficient printf("%s", ...) where we can use write_in_full.
Near as I can tell, this is based upon a merge commit in next.
Hmm I've always sent my patches this way, and I believe you can git am
-3 them on top of master easily. I can send you the updated series if
you want.
I'd appreciate an updated series if you can send it.  am -3 isn't
"easily" applying it.  Here I define "easy" as "the patch applies
without me needing to resolve conflicts":

 $ git co -b ph/parseopt master
 $ git am -3 -s X
 Applying: parse-opt: migrate fmt-merge-msg.
 error: patch failed: builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c:5
 error: builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c: patch does not apply
 Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
 Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
 CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c
 Recorded preimage for 'builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c'
 Failed to merge in the changes.
 Patch failed at 0001.
 When you have resolved this problem run "git am -3 --resolved".
 If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am -3 --skip".
 To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am -3 --abort".
Okay, I will then, but FWIW it means that when you'll try to merge this
in next it'll conflict at that time, so I'm not sure there's a huge win
for you at that point.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help