On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Unless/until we have an easy way to obtain the information "git-ls-files
-u" gives during conflict resolution, ls-files should stay on the list of
commonly used commands.
Doesn't "git status" tell you that? Or do you want the extra info from the
implicit --stage?
I think he doesn't want to see the other files that are already
merged successfully. git status shows them, git ls-files -u
does not.
I think it might make sense to support "git status --unmerged" or
something like that, where it filters the output by the tags it would
show.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*