Re: [PATCH] bash completion: Hide more plumbing commands
From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:14
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Petr Baudis [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
git <tab><tab> still shows way too many commands, some of them are clearly plumbing. This patch hides the plumbing commands liberally (that is, in special cases, users still might want to call one of the hidden commands, a *normal* workflow should never involve these, though - and if it does, we have a UI problem anyway). Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <redacted>Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <redacted> Though I use git ls-remote at least once every other day to see what branches are available on my egit/spearce.git fork. Its ok, I guess I can type a few extra characters...Revision-requested-by: me Unless/until we have an easy way to obtain the information "git-ls-files -u" gives during conflict resolution, ls-files should stay on the list of commonly used commands.
Doesn't "git status" tell you that? Or do you want the extra info from the implicit --stage? -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*