Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

Most frequently this involves changes where the same change is merged 
twice. [...]

You're not answering the question.  You cite cases when you consider
both the default and the full-history output incorrect from a
usefulness point of view.  The question is, what would the correct
output be, from your point of view?  What should be shown, and what
shouldn't?

  OG.