Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Roman Zippel [off-list ref] wrote:

Can we please get past this and look at what is required to produce the
correct history?

Roman - correct is --full-history -- any simplification that makes it
easy on your eyes *is* a simplification. And consumers that want to do
nice user-friendly simplification like gitk does can hang off the data
stream.

it's also possible to update it when merging/pulling new data.

If that's what you want to do, you can prototype it with a hook on
fetch and commit. That is definitely an area that hasn't been explored
- what nicer (but expensive) views on the history we have can be
afforded by pre-computing things on fetch and commit hooks.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@gmail.com
 martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff