Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Blindly concatenating the above two and feeding them to "git apply" *may*
happen to work by accident, not by design. This very much feels like a
hack of "This works most of the time for me, your mileage may vary" kind,
which we would want to avoid when we can.
Well, I changed my mind. Let's run with this and see what happens.
In support of this being a feature of git-apply, notice that it even
handles the situation correctly where the context of a hunk has been
influenced by previous hunks, as in
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
foo
+quux
bar
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
foo
quux
+abc
bar
With Don Zickus' recent patch, it also handles patches that go over
the same file twice.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Rast
trast@student.ethz.ch