Re: [PATCH 2/3] git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Blindly concatenating the above two and feeding them to "git apply" *may*
happen to work by accident, not by design.  This very much feels like a
hack of "This works most of the time for me, your mileage may vary" kind,
which we would want to avoid when we can.

Well, I changed my mind.  Let's run with this and see what happens.

The patch application is hunk-by-hunk in nature anyway, and if the user
munges the trailing context of the first half of an originally-single hunk
and the leading context of the latter half in an inconsistent way, we
would notice the problem anyway.