Re: [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option

Hi,

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Olivier Marin wrote:

Johannes Schindelin a écrit :

quoted

And I do not like this change either.  It proliferates the "we just 
die() and do not care about reusing the code where die()ing is not 
desired" paradigm.

I agree and I'm OK to try to do something about that. But not in that patch.

This patch is just to fix a regression.

But did you not now make it harder to fix "that"?  By relying on the die() 
behaviour in your regression fix?

Whatever,
Dscho