Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.

Hi,

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Brian Gernhardt wrote:

 Should this construct go into CodingStyle?  I seem to have to write 
 patches like this every month or so.

Yes, probably.  I am very sorry, I really should have reviewed those 
patches better (I know that ":" in expr is better than "match", "tac" is 
something to be avoided, and "wc -l" can output whitespace).  It did not 
help that I hated the fact that that series changed the original design 
without even understanding it.

Ciao,
Dscho