Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] git-submodule: New subcommand 'summary' (1) - code framework

From: Ping Yin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:19

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
"Ping Yin" [off-list ref] writes:


quoted
quoted
 > +             grep '^:160000\|:[0-9]\+ 160000' |
 >>
 >>  This looks troublesome.
 >>
 >>   - [0-9] is obviously wrong and [0-7] is what you meant;
 >>   - \| and \+ are not BRE but GNU.
 >>
 > man grep says
 >  In  basic regular expressions the metacharacters ?, +, {, |, (, and )
 > lose their special meaning; instead use the backslashed versions \?,
 > \+, \{, \|, \(, and \).
 >
 > Doen't it mean that '\|' is BRE ?

 It just says unlike in ERE, these characters are not special in BRE; it
 does not at all say using backslash like \?, \+, and \| makes them so.

 And they are not.  \(...\), \{m\}, \{m,\} and \{m,n\} are part of BRE, but
 the two you used (\+ and \|) are not.  GNU accept these two as extensions,
 but other POSIX implementations may have troubles with them.

  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html

 Please be gentle to porters to non GNU systems.  Either stay inside BRE
 (which I think we have managed to do with our usage of grep) or explicitly
 ask for ERE with "grep -E".
ok, 3x.


-- 
Ping Yin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help