Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] git-submodule: New subcommand 'summary' (1) - code framework
From: Ping Yin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:19
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
"Ping Yin" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
> + grep '^:160000\|:[0-9]\+ 160000' |>> >> This looks troublesome. >> >> - [0-9] is obviously wrong and [0-7] is what you meant; >> - \| and \+ are not BRE but GNU. >> > man grep says > In basic regular expressions the metacharacters ?, +, {, |, (, and ) > lose their special meaning; instead use the backslashed versions \?, > \+, \{, \|, \(, and \). > > Doen't it mean that '\|' is BRE ? It just says unlike in ERE, these characters are not special in BRE; it does not at all say using backslash like \?, \+, and \| makes them so. And they are not. \(...\), \{m\}, \{m,\} and \{m,n\} are part of BRE, but the two you used (\+ and \|) are not. GNU accept these two as extensions, but other POSIX implementations may have troubles with them. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html Please be gentle to porters to non GNU systems. Either stay inside BRE (which I think we have managed to do with our usage of grep) or explicitly ask for ERE with "grep -E".
ok, 3x. -- Ping Yin