"Ping Yin" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
> + grep '^:160000\|:[0-9]\+ 160000' |
This looks troublesome.
- [0-9] is obviously wrong and [0-7] is what you meant;
- \| and \+ are not BRE but GNU.
man grep says
In basic regular expressions the metacharacters ?, +, {, |, (, and )
lose their special meaning; instead use the backslashed versions \?,
\+, \{, \|, \(, and \).
Doen't it mean that '\|' is BRE ?
It just says unlike in ERE, these characters are not special in BRE; it
does not at all say using backslash like \?, \+, and \| makes them so.
And they are not. \(...\), \{m\}, \{m,\} and \{m,n\} are part of BRE, but
the two you used (\+ and \|) are not. GNU accept these two as extensions,
but other POSIX implementations may have troubles with them.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html
Please be gentle to porters to non GNU systems. Either stay inside BRE
(which I think we have managed to do with our usage of grep) or explicitly
ask for ERE with "grep -E".