Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Make git prune remove temporary packs that look like write failures

From: David Tweed <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:10

On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, David Tweed wrote:
quoted
+                       if(c>0 && c<4096 && stat(name, &status) == 0
+                          && status.st_mtime < now - 600){
Please have spaces after the "if" and before the "{" (just imitate the
style of the rest of the file).

Also, 10 minutes grace period for any ongoing fetch or repack seems a bit
arbitrary.  Maybe default to 10 minutes, and introduce
prune.packGracePeriod?
In response to this and to Nico's earlier mail, I _think_ the usage
with repack is completely safe. What I'm not sure about is that other
things like git-svn create temporary packs with usage/semantics I'm
not sure about. I'm happy to delete immediately if those who
understand the interactions in the whole of git say that's acceptable
when the user specifically calls git-prune.

-- 
cheers, dave tweed__________________________
david.tweed@gmail.com
Rm 124, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading.
"while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." --
attempted insult seen on slashdot
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help