Re: [RFC,PATCH] Make git prune remove temporary packs that look like write failures
From: David Tweed <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:10
On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, David Tweed wrote:quoted
+ if(c>0 && c<4096 && stat(name, &status) == 0 + && status.st_mtime < now - 600){Please have spaces after the "if" and before the "{" (just imitate the style of the rest of the file). Also, 10 minutes grace period for any ongoing fetch or repack seems a bit arbitrary. Maybe default to 10 minutes, and introduce prune.packGracePeriod?
In response to this and to Nico's earlier mail, I _think_ the usage with repack is completely safe. What I'm not sure about is that other things like git-svn create temporary packs with usage/semantics I'm not sure about. I'm happy to delete immediately if those who understand the interactions in the whole of git say that's acceptable when the user specifically calls git-prune. -- cheers, dave tweed__________________________ david.tweed@gmail.com Rm 124, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading. "while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." -- attempted insult seen on slashdot