Re: [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:05
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names · Alex Riesen <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Junio C Hamano, Sun, Jan 13, 2008 23:36:34 +0100:
+test_expect_success 'very long name in the index handled sanely' ' + + a=a && # 1 + a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 16 + a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 256 + a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 4096
I'd expect it to fail on some systems (everywindowsthing up to w2k, maybe some commercial unices).