[PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names

Subsystems: the rest

DORMANTno replies

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:05

We currently use lower 12-bit (masked with CE_NAMEMASK) in the
ce_flags field to store the length of the name in cache_entry,
without checking the length parameter given to
create_ce_flags().  This can make us store incorrect length.

Currently we are mostly protected by the fact that many
codepaths first copy the path in a variable of size PATH_MAX,
which typically is 4096 that happens to match the limit, but
that feels like a bug waiting to happen.  Besides, that would
not allow us to shorten the width of CE_NAMEMASK to use the bits
for new flags.

This redefines the meaning of the name length stored in the
cache_entry.  A name that does not fit is represented by storing
CE_NAMEMASK in the field, and the actual length needs to be
computed by actually counting the bytes in the name[] field.
This way, only the unusually long paths need to suffer.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
---

 Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

 > About the CE_NAMEMASK limitation (and currently we do not check
 > it, so I think we would be screwed when a pathname that is
 > longer than (CE_NAMEMASK+1) and still fits under PATH_MAX is
 > given), I think we do not have to limit the maximum pathname
 > length.  Instead we can teach create_ce_flags() and ce_namelen()
 > that a name longer than 2k (or 4k) has the NAMEMASK bits that
 > are all 1 and ce->name[] must be counted if so (with an obvious
 > optimization to start counting at byte position 2k or 4k in
 > ce_namelen()).

 This should fix it.  Passes tests including the new test that
 the existing code fails.

 cache.h          |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 t/t0000-basic.sh |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 39331c2..ad53acc 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -114,8 +114,21 @@ struct cache_entry {
 #define CE_VALID     (0x8000)
 #define CE_STAGESHIFT 12
 
-#define create_ce_flags(len, stage) htons((len) | ((stage) << CE_STAGESHIFT))
-#define ce_namelen(ce) (CE_NAMEMASK & ntohs((ce)->ce_flags))
+static inline unsigned create_ce_flags(size_t len, unsigned stage)
+{
+	if (len >= CE_NAMEMASK)
+		len = CE_NAMEMASK;
+	return htons(len | (stage << CE_STAGESHIFT));
+}
+
+static inline size_t ce_namelen(const struct cache_entry *ce)
+{
+	size_t len = ntohs((ce)->ce_flags) & CE_NAMEMASK;
+	if (len < CE_NAMEMASK) /* likely */
+		return len;
+	return strlen(ce->name + CE_NAMEMASK) + CE_NAMEMASK;
+}
+
 #define ce_size(ce) cache_entry_size(ce_namelen(ce))
 #define ce_stage(ce) ((CE_STAGEMASK & ntohs((ce)->ce_flags)) >> CE_STAGESHIFT)
 
diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
index 4e49d59..40551a3 100755
--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
@@ -297,4 +297,22 @@ test_expect_success 'absolute path works as expected' '
 	test "$sym" = "$(test-absolute-path $dir2/syml)"
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'very long name in the index handled sanely' '
+
+	a=a && # 1
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 16
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 256
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 4096
+	a=${a}q
+
+	>path4 &&
+	git update-index --add path4 &&
+	(
+		git ls-files -s path4 |
+		sed -e "s/	.*/	/" |
+		tr -d "\012"
+		echo "$a"
+	) | git update-index --index-info
+'
+
 test_done

Re: [PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names

From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:05

Junio C Hamano, Sun, Jan 13, 2008 23:36:34 +0100:
+test_expect_success 'very long name in the index handled sanely' '
+
+	a=a && # 1
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 16
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 256
+	a=$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a$a && # 4096
I'd expect it to fail on some systems (everywindowsthing up to w2k,
maybe some commercial unices).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help