Re: remote#branch

Hi,

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Jan Hudec wrote:

On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 00:01:57 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Jan Hudec wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 22:35:25 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

',' is allowed in ref names, so ',' is out.

Actually since many characters that are allowed in ref name are not 
allowed in URL at all, the ref-name has to be url-escaped. Which 
brings all characters back in, because they can always be specified 
escaped.

No.  The URL part of it has to be encoded.  But the ref names do 
_not_.  (If we really want to have a way to specify the remote URL and 
the branch(es) we want to fetch _at the same time_.)

If the branch names are not url-escaped, than the result is not an URL. 
Which is just ugly and confusing. If it looks like an URL, it should 
better be one.

So all you're saying is: it is not possible.

Well, discussion ended, I guess.

Ciao,
Dscho