cogito and remote#branch, was Re: [PATCH] Git homepage: remove all the references to Cogito

Hi,

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Petr Baudis wrote:

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 11:38:00PM +0200, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:

quoted

@@ -286,15 +285,6 @@ a gitweb interface, at <a href="http://repo.or.cz/">http://repo.or.cz/</a>.</p>
 
 <dl>
 
-<dt id="cogito">Cogito</dt>
-<dd>
-<a href="http://git.or.cz/cogito/">Cogito</a>
-is a popular version control system on top of Git.
-It aims at seamless user interface and ease of use, providing
-generally smoother user experience than the "raw" Git interface
-and indeed also many other version control systems. However, it
-also lacks many advanced capabilities of Git and is currently
-being slowly phased out.</dd>
 
 <dt id="stgit">StGIT</dt>
 <dd><a href="http://www.procode.org/stgit/">Stacked Git</a> provides

I'm not sure this is good idea, Cogito is still quite frequently used
and it should be documented that it exists.

I agree.  But maybe it could be marked as unmaintained?  Maybe someone 
steps up to maintain it.  Or, even better, comes up with a list of "this 
is what I like do regularly with cogito, but there's no easy way with core 
git" issues.

In related news, I recently thought about the url#branch issue.

There were three arguments against it AFAIR: "#" is a comment marker, and 
this syntax is not extensible to more than one branch names.  And that the 
branch name is not really a part of the URL.

Turns out that I am not so sure about the last two issues.

It is easily extensible to more than one branch by remote#branch1#branch2, 
and in a very real sense, this is a resource locator.

And we could replace the "#" by every character that is illegal in ref 
names as well as URLs.  I propose SPC.  ('#' is allowed in refnames.)

Ciao,
Dscho