Re: [PATCH] t9400: Add some tests for checkout
From: Frank Lichtenheld <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:38
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:24:05PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:quoted
+# clean up +rm -fr cvswork2 +rm -fr "$SERVERDIR" +cd "$WORKDIR" && +git clone -q --local --bare "$WORKDIR/.git" "$SERVERDIR" >/dev/null 2>&1 && +GIT_DIR="$SERVERDIR" git config --bool gitcvs.enabled true && +GIT_DIR="$SERVERDIR" git config gitcvs.logfile "$SERVERDIR/gitcvs.log" || +exit 1Should this not be in a test_expect_success, too?
Since I do this several times and since it is easier to see what tests it belongs to if it isn't buried in one of them, I would say "no".
quoted
-#------------ -# CVS UPDATE -#------------ +#-------------- +# CVS CHECKOUT +#-------------- +test_expect_success 'cvs checkout failure (HEAD)' \ + 'if GIT_CONFIG="$git_config" cvs -Q co -d cvswork2 HEAD >cvs.log 2>&1 + then + echo unexpected cvs success + false + else + true + fi &&How about "! GIT_CONFIG..." instead of the "if..then..else..fi" ?
I don't really care. IIRC I took the idiom from another testfile. Several other tests in this file already use it, too. So unless Junio prefers I change all occourences, I will not.
quoted
+ cat cvs.log | grep -q "not a branch" && + test ! -d cvswork2' +rm -fr cvswork2Again, for consistency, I'd include this in the test case.
Again, I don't really care. But for consistency with the rest of the file I will only change it if I'm asked to change all occourences. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [off-list ref] www: http://www.djpig.de/