Re: [PATCH] Small cache_tree_write refactor.
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:36
Hi, On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/cache-tree.c +++ b/cache-tree.c@@ -369,10 +369,8 @@ int cache_tree_update(struct cache_tree *it, return 0; } -static void write_one(struct cache_tree *it, - char *path, - int pathlen, - struct strbuf *buffer) +static void write_one(struct strbuf *buffer, struct cache_tree *it, + const char *path, int pathlen)
I don't know... is this really needed? In some other projects, the coding standard prefers the parameters in "in"..."out" order. Ciao, Dscho