Re: Question about git-log --date and default behavior

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:27:50AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

I think changing the default for 'git-log' should be OK, as it's a
porcelain, but others might disagree.

As Johannes pointed out, at least gitk is using 'git-log' behind the
scenes, so this is probably not a good idea. It seems like a bit of a
conflict, though, since git-log is supposed to be porcelain (I thought).

-Peff