Question about git-log --date and default behavior

4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Question about git-log --date and default behavior

From: Seth Falcon <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:31

Is there a way have git-log use --date=local as the default for my
repositories?

I found that I could make an alias like 'llog' to do this, but I
wondered if there was a way that wouldn't require me to type anything
different.


+ seth

-- 
Seth Falcon

Re: Question about git-log --date and default behavior

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:31

On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:35:31PM -0700, Seth Falcon wrote:
Is there a way have git-log use --date=local as the default for my
repositories?
I don't think so. It would be nice to have a config option, but that
should almost certainly wait until post-1.5.3.

I think changing the default for 'git-log' should be OK, as it's a
porcelain, but others might disagree.

-Peff

Re: Question about git-log --date and default behavior

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:31

Hi,

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Seth Falcon wrote:
Is there a way have git-log use --date=local as the default for my
repositories?
I guess this could break scripts (AFAIR gitk uses "git log" instead of 
"git rev-list" these days, and parses the output).

Better stay with your alias.

Ciao,
Dscho

Re: Question about git-log --date and default behavior

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:31

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:27:50AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
I think changing the default for 'git-log' should be OK, as it's a
porcelain, but others might disagree.
As Johannes pointed out, at least gitk is using 'git-log' behind the
scenes, so this is probably not a good idea. It seems like a bit of a
conflict, though, since git-log is supposed to be porcelain (I thought).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help