Re: [CORRECTED PATCH] Introduce file with the common default build-time items.
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:17
Shawn, good da.y Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:22:04PM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
OK, it means that git-gui will be totally separated from the git.git? And one will download it as the separate tarball?That's one option. But Junio and I are also considering keeping it inside the git tarball as well, as many users have gotten used to it being in the core Git distribution. I think it all depends on if myself (or someone else) adds subproject recursion support into git-archive. ;-)
OK, I just wondered what to expect from the 1.6, since I am trying to keep FreeBSD port in sync with the latest Git release.
...quoted
Makefile | 17 +++++++++++------ common-make-vars.def | 11 +++++++++++ configure.ac | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 common-make-vars.def... I dunno. 25 insertions and 7 deletions to reduce two uses of 'wish' into one use of 'wish'? That hardly seems worth the additional 18 lines of code.
11 of new lines are common-make-vars.def: it is heavily commented.
Feels like code churn to me. And I rarely feel code churn. I'm usually a lot more caviler about changing things than Junio, Dscho, Nico, Linus, ...
OK, let us wait for the other's reaction. May be you're right and it doesn't worth it. But I always felt that if I can change something by changing it only in one place, then it worth it. Otherwise I should remember all places where it is used and this leads to errors. But maybe the 'wish' and 'tclsh' are not worth it. Thank you! -- Eygene