Re: git-p4import.py robustness changes
From: Simon Hausmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:16
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:06:49 Scott Lamb wrote:
Simon Hausmann wrote:quoted
_If_ one of you decides to pull then my plan is to discontinue the git-p4 branch in the fast-export repository and instead work in a git.git fork on repo.or.cz (similar to the fastimport repository).So you'll continue maintain this code and others should submit changes through you? What is the best way to do so? (Not sure what it was before, or if it would change under this plan.) Email a format-patch To: you? Cc: this list? some other list? no list?
I would say whichever you prefer :) For the fast-export repository multiple people have access and for example after Han-Wen made a lot of patches I asked Chris Lee (owner of the module on repo.or.cz) to add Han-Wen to the list of people with push access and he pushed his changes directly. I actually like working that way for a project that is as simple as that, I don't mind if somebody pushes simple changes directly as much as I like discussing bigger plans if they potentially clash with somebody else's work or use-case. So if git-p4 continues to live in fast-export I'll continue to encourage Chris Lee to give git-p4 contributors push access, if it's in a git.git fork I'd be happy to do so myself (give access). If git-p4 also ends up in git/contrib/fastimport and somebody likes to send patches to Junio or somebody else and CC this list that's fine with me, too. It's just a few lines of python code after all ;-) Simon
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes