On Saturday 02 June 2007 23:33:25 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Scott Lamb [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On May 31, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Actually, my preference is to have a "patch 0" before all of the
above, that demotes git-p4import to contrib/ hierarchy. Having
no access to p4 managed repositories (nor much inclination to
get one), I can never test nor maintain it myself, so it is just
crazy for me to be the maintainer for it.
Will do. What does that mean for Documentation/git-p4import.txt and
the git-p4 rpm (defined in git.spec.in)? Should I move them with it?
(Seems nothing else in the main tree references contrib.) If so,
maybe I should set up a common "Documentation/asciidoc.mak" or
something for building the man/html pages rather than duplicating all
that Makefile logic.
A much more preferable alternative is for you to say "Hey, don't
say you want to demote it. I'll keep it maintained, I regularly
use p4 and have a strong incentive to keep it working". Then we
do not have to do the "patch 0" ;-)
On the topic of git integration with perforce, what are the chances of getting
git-p4 ( http://repo.or.cz/w/fast-export.git ) into git's contrib/fast-export
area? :)
git-p4 can do everything git-p4import can do plus a lot more (it can track
multiple branches, it's a hell of a lot faster, it can export back to p4 and
it also works on Windows!).
Simon