hoi :)
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:17:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
quoted
we could also introduce "<tree-ish>/<path>" for absolute path entries.
When you name the tree-ish with usual "branch name", where does
the branch name end and pathname start? What happens when there
is an ambiguity, and how costly to detect such an ambiguity to
begin with?
well, if you know that it starts with a tree-ish there is no
ambiguity [...]
Wrong. For example, mw/submodules~10 _is_ a tree-ish (if you have a branch
named "mw/submodules").
so what?
a better argument is that one can have both refs/tags/a and
refs/heads/a/b.
So just forget my suggestion...
--
Martin Waitz