Re: [PATCH 11/10] allow forcing index v2 and 64-bit offset treshold

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

This is necessary for testing the new capabilities in some automated 
way without having an actual 4GB+ pack.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <redacted>
---

I should write some tests... when I have more time.

It appears everybody is short of time.  I am having two
troubles.  Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or
comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate,
and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself.

At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews.  ;-)

They are _not_ even in 'pu'.  I am talking about things that
have been cooking.

quoted

quoted

ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile

???

Remnant of a change to that file which was later reverted but mtime 
doesn't match the index.

Double 'd'?