Re: [PATCH 11/10] allow forcing index v2 and 64-bit offset treshold

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

This is necessary for testing the new capabilities in some automated 
way without having an actual 4GB+ pack.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <redacted>
---

I should write some tests... when I have more time.

It appears everybody is short of time.  I am having two
troubles.  Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or
comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate,
and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself.

At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews.  ;-)

They are _not_ even in 'pu'.  I am talking about things that
have been cooking.

quoted

quoted

ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile

???

Remnant of a change to that file which was later reverted but mtime 
doesn't match the index.

Double 'd'?

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

It appears everybody is short of time.  I am having two
troubles.  Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or
comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate,
and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself.

At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews.  ;-)

They are _not_ even in 'pu'.  I am talking about things that
have been cooking.

Remember that positive comments are by default much less verbose than 
negative ones. In other words, no news is probably good news.

quoted

quoted

quoted

ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile

???

$ touch t/Makefile
$ git diff


Nicolas