Re: basics... when reading docs doesn't help
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:02
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
And, so, it's a pity I cloned Paul's tree yesterday with the "old" git. And from your answer above it seems like some features of the "new" git will not be available with this tree, like equally named local and remote branches, etc. There isn't a way to convert such a "old style" tree to the "new style", is there? Not a big deal, will re-clone at some point, maybe when we get local git mirrors...
There's a conversion script to help you convert in place if you care. Look at the git list for an email that looks something like this: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:16:12 -0400 From: Shawn O. Pearce [off-list ref] To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Upgrade to 1.5.0 utility Yesterday on #git DrNick wanted a script to update a pre-1.5.0 Git repository to be like a 1.5.0 (and later) style repository. ... which has a script in it to do this (it uses another script that is already in git/contrib/ that just moves all the ".git/remotes" entries as-is from the remotes files into the .git/config file) I haven't tested it myself, so caveat emptor. But the config file format really isn't *that* complicated - do the conversion with the script, and then just go back and look at .git/config and verify that it looks sane, or edit it to match your taste. Linus