Re: basics... when reading docs doesn't help
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:02
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You need to mark "refs/heads/origin" as always following the remote
"master", even if it gets re-based. You do that by adding a "+" before
the refspec that describes the remote.
These days, with git-1.5.x, "git clone" will do that for you (and make the
remotes fall under "refs/remotes/origin/*" instead - they're considered
separate branches from the local branches these days). However, since you
created the repository with an older git version, it still uses the
original format (and even though you upgraded your git binary, it will use
the old-fashioned branch format for remote branches and for
configuration).
So in your case, the remote is probably described by the
.git/remotes/origin file, and it looks something like
URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc
Pull: master:origin
and you should just change that "Pull:" line to have a "+" in front of the
refspec:
URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc
Pull: +master:origin
which tells git that the remote "master" branch should now
*unconditionally* be followed into the local "origin" branch when you
pull.
(In a more modern setup, you wouldn't have a .git/remotes/origin file at
all, insead you would have something like this in the .git/config file:
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
which means that there is a remote called "origin", and all of the remote
heads in that remote ("refs/heads/*") will be fetched into the local
repository under "refs/remotes/origin/*". And the "+" again means that we
do this even if it's not a fast-forward, ie we trust the remote
explicitly.
So "git fetch origin" will fetch *all* branches from "origin" into your
local repository, but to distinguish them from your *own* branches, they
will be under .git/refs/remotes/ instead of your "real" local branches
that are in ".git/refs/heads/. So you can now see the difference between
your *local* version of a branch X and the remote version of that same
branch by using "X" and "remotes/origin/X" respectively to describe that
branch.
Then, the second part of the above config file means that when you're on
the local "master" branch and do a "git pull", it will fetch it from the
remote "origin", and merge the remote "refs/heads/master" branch from that
remote (the same one that will be fetched into refs/remotes/origin/master
by a "git fetch".
Yeah, this is all a bit complex, and it takes a while to wrap your head
around it, but I have to say, once you do, the git-1.5.x layout really
*is* very powerful, and it's actually very natural too (but the "very
natural" part only comes after you have that "Aaahh!" moment!)Aha, so, that's how it is then! Why hasn't anybody explained this to me strait away?!:-)))) Yeah, hopefully, I'll learn to at least use this thing efficiently enough. Someone has to write a book on it though... And, so, it's a pity I cloned Paul's tree yesterday with the "old" git. And from your answer above it seems like some features of the "new" git will not be available with this tree, like equally named local and remote branches, etc. There isn't a way to convert such a "old style" tree to the "new style", is there? Not a big deal, will re-clone at some point, maybe when we get local git mirrors... Many thanks for taking your time to answer, Linus! Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski