Re: [PATCH] Added make options NO_GUI and WITH_P4IMPORT.
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:00
On 3/21/07, Eygene Ryabinkin [off-list ref] wrote:
Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:38:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I am happening to develop on some machines on which I have no X-Windows or any GUI providers at all, so I prefer not to have the Tcl/Tk dependency at all.If you don't do something, it is often interesting to state why: if you don't install something to prevent a dependency you don't want to have, it is different from saying that you do not want to have a GUI, _even if_ the dependency is there already.I read his message as "these are useless for me, so why introduce a useless dependency?" The "effect" is to have no Tcl dependence, but the original reason is to have no GUI.Yep, you're right. That was I meant originally. How do you feel about NO_GUI or NO_TCL names?
That'd be NO_TCL_TK. TCL has nothing to do with graphics. And you have one more supporter for NO_GUI (my server has no usable graphics, will never have and runs cron jobs with git in them).