Re: Git rescue mission
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:53
<opublikowany i wysłany> Bill Lear wrote:
On Thursday, February 8, 2007 at 14:13:47 (-0800) Linus Torvalds writes:quoted
... It's one of the bigger UI warts that got fixed since the last release (although it got fixed by better config management, and as such you'll only *see* the fixes if you end up doing the initial clone with the new git version - if you use a new git version with an old repo, many - but not all - bad semantics will remain). ...With regard to the new version and old repos, am I correct in assuming that we can upgrade our old repo (a bare one) to the new git by first installing the new git, and then doing this: % cd /repos/git % mv project project.old_git % git --bare clone project.old_git project
% git clone --bare project.old_git project although usually notation project.git is used, so I think it would be % git clone --bare project.old_git project.git "git --bare <cmd>" is equivalent to "git --git-dir=pwd". You want to make bare clone "git clone --bare", not invoke git command in bare repository "git --bare <cmd>": there is no repository yet! You can just edit .git/config (prehaps generate it first from .git/remotes/origin file using remotes2config.sh script from contrib section), and move (rename) branches. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git