Re: [BUG] Empty reflogs and "git log -g"

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:

quoted

 when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax 
gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g' 
just skips this ref.

I could be that some older git version produces empty messages. But I'd 
regard the empty messages to be the problem. Or is the current Git version 
still producing such entries?

StGIT used to produce no reflog messages; I don't know if this has improved.
But you can have old reflog entries with empty messages; git log -g should
deal with them IMHO.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git