Re: [BUG] Empty reflogs and "git log -g"
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:53
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
Hi, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
On 2/8/07, Santi Béjar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi *, when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g' just skips this ref.Also: $ git log origin/master works, but $ git log -g origin/master does not. You have to put the remotes prefix.
I hesitate "fixing" that. I mean, if you want to know about the remote branch "master" why not be precise? Yes, "git log" _is_ nice if you want to be sloppy. But if you _have_ to have it, see attached patch. I will not push for it in time for 1.5.0, though, since I have a track record of not getting patches right on the first try. Ciao, Dscho --- reflog-walk.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/reflog-walk.c b/reflog-walk.c
index 653ec95..430faef 100644
--- a/reflog-walk.c
+++ b/reflog-walk.c@@ -174,6 +174,19 @@ void add_reflog_for_walk(struct reflog_walk_info *info, branch = xstrdup(head); } reflogs = read_complete_reflog(branch); + if (!reflogs || reflogs->nr == 0) { + unsigned char sha1[20]; + char *b; + if (dwim_ref(branch, strlen(branch), sha1, &b) == 1) { + if (reflogs) { + free(reflogs->ref); + free(reflogs); + } + free(branch); + branch = b; + reflogs = read_complete_reflog(branch); + } + } if (!reflogs || reflogs->nr == 0) die("No reflogs found for '%s'", branch); path_list_insert(branch, &info->complete_reflogs)->util