Re: MinGW port usable

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

Daniel Barkalow wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

quoted

(*) The reason is that on Windows read() and write() cannot operate on
descriptors created by socket(). A work-around is to implement a (threaded)
proxy, but that's almost the same as if netcat were used as
GIT_PROXY_COMMAND.

Can you do

#define read(fd, buffer, len) recv(fd, buffer, len, 0)
#define write(fd, buffer, len) send(fd, buffer, len, 0)

in the appropriate file?

I doubt that recv and send can operate on regular file descriptors, as
opened by _pipe(), open(), can they?

I don't think so, but I think it should be possible to make 
packet_write/packet_read always get a socket, by calling receive-pack and 
upload-pack with a socket pair instead of a pair of pipes. Actually, IIRC, 
this would be beneficial for making programs not leak file descriptors or 
double-close them, because there's already the issue on *nix that it isn't 
consistant whether both directions are the same file descriptor.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*