Re: MinGW port usable

Hi,

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On the git repository, using MinGW:
Using cygwin:

IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average 
0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)

Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?

Both with NO_MMAP=YesPlease.

Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be in 
getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure userspace).

Right. That's why I did the test on the _same_ repository. (Not just both 
git repositories, but in the same path on the same machine.)

That said, I find the numbers quite convincing. On a (much weaker 
equipped) Linux bux, it takes 0.65s and 1.2s, respectively.

Ciao,
Dscho