Dear diary, on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:24:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] said that...
Robert Collins wrote:
quoted
However, I'm still convinced that tracking the user intention of renames
leads to a slicker system than renames via inference.
Well, there was (abandoned for now) idea of rr2-cache, the cache of how
renames were resolved during merge conflict resolving.
Is that really relevant? It rather seems something like rerere, which is
handy, but only if you are the one who is actually supposed to have clue
on how should it be resolved; the caches aren't replicated on clones.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)