Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-11

Re: [PATCH] Introducing cg-xxdiff for conflict resolution

From: Martin Langhoff <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:41

On 9/24/06, Petr Baudis [off-list ref] wrote:
In that case I think the most natural way for this tool to interface
would be in part of some kind of cg-resolve swiss-army knife for
resolving conflicts:

       cg-resolve --mine       for taking just the version from _my_
                               side of the merge
       cg-resolve --other      dtto for the other side of the merge
       cg-resolve -g           graphically resolve
                               (vimdiff/xxdiff/meld/...)
       surely more would be invented over time
Sounds reasonable. But I think we have to keep in mind that you only
know if the conflict is nasty after you have a go at fixing it. And I
sometimes find that I try with cg-xxdiff... and I go back to the plain
old conflict. That is why it doesn't clobber the file -- to protect a
manual merge in process.
Well, all the Cogito scripts should have some consistent form. :-)
heh - consistency? overrated! ;-)
But I can adjust such details when applying your patch.
Great! -- I'm travelling and at an airport "free access" computer. It
should be illegal to run airports without free wifi in this day and
age.

cheers,


martin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help