Re: [PATCH] Introducing cg-xxdiff for conflict resolution
From: Petr Baudis <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:41
Dear diary, on Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 07:02:28PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Langhoff [off-list ref] said that...
On 9/24/06, Petr Baudis [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hmm, I think this would be generally more useful during the actual merge phase - if merge returns error, you fire up git-magic-conflict-resolution-driver and have fun.Well, in many cases the conflict markers are just ok and exactly what I want. If the two sides of the conflict are clear, the resolution is usually clear as well. OTOH, it may be a big mess where xxdiff gives more visual cues as to WTF is going on... IOW I don't want it to be part of the merge automagically...
In that case I think the most natural way for this tool to interface would be in part of some kind of cg-resolve swiss-army knife for resolving conflicts: cg-resolve --mine for taking just the version from _my_ side of the merge cg-resolve --other dtto for the other side of the merge cg-resolve -g graphically resolve (vimdiff/xxdiff/meld/...) surely more would be invented over time
quoted
quoted
+. git-sh-setupUh-oh. :-)Is that bad? <blush> I am not doing anything too cogito-specific, and I just don't know what cg-Xlib will do for me...
Well, all the Cogito scripts should have some consistent form. :-) But I can adjust such details when applying your patch. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)