Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:21
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
(i) I _think_ that it would be less of a surprise if a branch would be checked first.
Yeah, I guess that's true.
Actually, I'm almost inclined to suggest making Git fail violently in case of an ambiguous name.
Maybe not fail, but at least warn very loudly. Linus